UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
| |
|
|
| þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
OR
| |
|
|
| o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission File
Number 000-50132
Sterling
Chemicals, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
| Delaware |
|
76-0502785 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| incorporation or organization) |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 333 Clay Street, Suite 3600 |
|
(713) 650-3700 |
| Houston, Texas 77002-4109 |
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, |
| (Address of principal executive
offices) |
|
including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No
o.
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a
non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO
ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by
Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent
to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ.
As of October 31, 2006, Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. had 2,828,460 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share,
outstanding.
IMPORTANT
INFORMATION REGARDING THIS FORM 10-Q
Unless otherwise indicated, references
to “we,” “us,” “our” and “ours” in this Form 10-Q refer collectively to Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary.
Readers should consider
the following information as they review this Form 10-Q:
Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain written and oral statements
made or incorporated by reference from time to time by us or our representatives
are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the
United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to
be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, without
limitation, any statement that may project, indicate or imply future results,
events, performance or achievements, and may contain or be identified by the
words “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “estimate,”
“believe,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “will be,” “will
continue,” “will likely result,” “project,” “forecast,” “budget” and similar
expressions. Statements in this report that contain forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, information concerning our possible or assumed
future results of operations and statements about the following subjects:
| |
• |
|
the cyclicality of the petrochemicals industry; |
| |
| |
• |
|
current and future industry conditions; |
| |
| |
• |
|
the extent and timing of expansions of production capacity of our
products, by us or by our competitors; |
| |
| |
• |
|
the potential effects of market and industry conditions and
cyclicality on our business strategy, results of operations or financial
position; |
| |
| |
• |
|
the level of expected savings from our cost reduction
initiatives; |
| |
| |
• |
|
the adequacy of our liquidity; |
| |
| |
• |
|
our environmental management programs and safety initiatives; |
| |
| |
• |
|
our market sensitive financial instruments; |
| |
| |
• |
|
future uses of and requirements for financial resources; |
| |
| |
• |
|
future contractual obligations; |
| |
| |
• |
|
future amendments or renewals of existing contractual
relationships; |
| |
| |
• |
|
business strategies; |
| |
| |
• |
|
growth opportunities; |
| |
| |
• |
|
competitive position; |
| |
| |
• |
|
expected financial position; |
| |
| |
• |
|
future cash flows; |
| |
| |
• |
|
future dividends; |
| |
| |
• |
|
financing plans; |
| |
| |
• |
|
budgets for capital and other expenditures; |
| |
| |
• |
|
plans and objectives of management; |
| |
| |
• |
|
outcomes of legal proceedings; |
| |
| |
• |
|
compliance with applicable laws; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
adequacy of insurance coverage or indemnification
rights. |
Such statements are
based upon current information and expectations and inherently are subject to a
variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expected or expressed in the forward-looking statements.
Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the following:
| |
• |
|
the timing and extent of changes in commodity prices for our products
and for raw materials; |
| |
| |
• |
|
petrochemicals industry production capacity and operating rates; |
| |
| |
• |
|
market conditions in the petrochemicals industry, including the
supply-demand balance for our products and regional differences in the
costs of raw materials and energy; |
| |
| |
• |
|
competition, including competitive products, pricing pressures and
regional variations in manufacturing costs; |
| |
| |
• |
|
our ability to maintain adequate quantities of sales under our
contracts; |
| |
| |
• |
|
obsolescence of product lines and manufacturing processes; |
| |
| |
• |
|
the timing and extent of changes in global economic and business
conditions; |
| |
| |
• |
|
increases in raw materials and energy costs, including the cost of
natural gas; |
i
| |
• |
|
our ability to obtain raw materials, energy and ocean-going vessels at
competitive prices, in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; |
| |
| |
• |
|
regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental
regulations; |
| |
| |
• |
|
compliance with environmental laws and regulations; |
| |
| |
• |
|
customer preferences; |
| |
| |
• |
|
our ability to attract or retain high quality employees; |
| |
| |
• |
|
operating hazards attendant to the petrochemicals industry; |
| |
| |
• |
|
casualty losses, including those resulting from weather related
events; |
| |
| |
• |
|
changes in foreign, political, social and economic conditions; |
| |
| |
• |
|
risks of war, military operations, other armed hostilities, terrorist
acts and embargoes; |
| |
| |
• |
|
changes in technology, which could require significant capital
expenditures in order to maintain competitiveness or cause existing
manufacturing processes to become obsolete; |
| |
| |
• |
|
effects of litigation; |
| |
| |
• |
|
cost, availability and adequacy of insurance; |
| |
| |
• |
|
adequacy of our sources of liquidity; and |
| |
| |
• |
|
various other matters, many of which are beyond our
control. |
The risks included here are not
exhaustive. Other sections of this report and our other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (our
“Annual Report”), include additional factors that could adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition and performance. See
“Risk Factors” contained in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report.
Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance
on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements included in this Form
10-Q speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q and are not guarantees of
future performance. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, such expectations may prove to have
been incorrect. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in
their entirety by these cautionary statements.
Subsequent
Events
All statements contained in this Form
10-Q, including the forward-looking statements discussed above, are made as of
November 13, 2006, unless those statements are expressly made as of another
date. We disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy of any information
contained in this Form 10-Q to the extent such information is affected or
impacted by events, circumstances or developments occurring after
November 13, 2006, or by the passage of time after such date. Except to the
extent required by applicable securities laws, we expressly disclaim any
obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any
statement or information contained in this Form 10-Q, including the
forward-looking statements discussed above, to reflect any change in our
expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any statement or information is based.
Document
Summaries
Descriptions of documents and
agreements contained in this Form 10-Q are provided in summary form only, and
such summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the actual
documents and agreements filed as exhibits to our Annual Report, other periodic
reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission or this Form 10-Q.
Access to
Filings
Access to our annual reports on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and
amendments to those reports, filed with or furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, as well as
reports filed electronically pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, may
be obtained through our website (http://www.sterlingchemicals.com). Our website
provides a hyperlink to the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
where these reports may be viewed and printed at no cost as soon as reasonably
practicable after we have electronically filed such reports with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The contents of our website are not, and shall not be
deemed to be, incorporated into this report.
ii
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
INDEX
1
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
| |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share
Data) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
189,916 |
|
|
$ |
148,733 |
|
|
$ |
476,972 |
|
|
$ |
492,455 |
|
|
Cost of goods
sold |
|
|
176,582 |
|
|
|
143,879 |
|
|
|
470,008 |
|
|
|
490,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
13,334 |
|
|
|
4,854 |
|
|
|
6,964 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
6,342 |
|
|
|
5,540 |
|
|
Other
(income) expense |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(15,724 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Interest and debt
related expenses, net of interest income |
|
|
2,663 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
|
7,566 |
|
|
|
7,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
20,109 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
8,780 |
|
|
|
(11,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
10,160 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
5,827 |
|
|
|
(4,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
9,949 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
2,953 |
|
|
$ |
(7,206 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations (net of tax benefit of $1,139, $5,290, $2,223 and
$8,018, respectively) |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(9,164 |
) |
|
|
(1,127 |
) |
|
|
(13,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
$ |
10,574 |
|
|
$ |
(9,049 |
) |
|
$ |
1,826 |
|
|
$ |
(21,094 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
dividends |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
6,031 |
|
|
|
5,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
8,484 |
|
|
$ |
(10,835 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,205 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per
share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
2.78 |
|
|
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.37 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
(3.24 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(4.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per
share |
|
$ |
3.00 |
|
|
$ |
(3.83 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.37 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
(3.24 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(4.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
(3.83 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic : |
|
|
2,828,460 |
|
|
|
2,828,474 |
|
|
|
2,828,462 |
|
|
|
2,827,566 |
|
|
Diluted : |
|
|
6,616,146 |
|
|
|
2,828,474 |
|
|
|
2,828,462 |
|
|
|
2,827,566 |
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
| |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents |
|
$ |
27,370 |
|
|
$ |
42,197 |
|
|
Accounts receivable,
net of allowance of $1,279 and $953, respectively |
|
|
42,447 |
|
|
|
57,261 |
|
|
Accounts receivable,
other |
|
|
6,120 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Inventories,
net |
|
|
53,501 |
|
|
|
39,094 |
|
|
Prepaid
expenses |
|
|
10,456 |
|
|
|
4,888 |
|
|
Deferred tax
asset |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
Assets of discontinued
operations |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
assets |
|
|
143,439 |
|
|
|
148,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment, net |
|
|
216,410 |
|
|
|
230,018 |
|
|
Other assets,
net |
|
|
9,070 |
|
|
|
8,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
368,919 |
|
|
$ |
386,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable |
|
$ |
34,548 |
|
|
$ |
43,912 |
|
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
|
22,010 |
|
|
|
23,690 |
|
|
Liabilities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
3,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities |
|
|
57,314 |
|
|
|
71,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
100,579 |
|
|
|
100,579 |
|
|
Deferred tax
liability |
|
|
11,799 |
|
|
|
8,196 |
|
|
Deferred credits and
other liabilities |
|
|
68,674 |
|
|
|
77,804 |
|
|
Redeemable preferred
stock |
|
|
54,334 |
|
|
|
48,302 |
|
|
Commitments and
contingencies (Note 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par
value |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
Additional paid-in
capital |
|
|
186,659 |
|
|
|
192,551 |
|
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
|
(106,129 |
) |
|
|
(107,955 |
) |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
|
|
(4,339 |
) |
|
|
(4,339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’
equity |
|
|
76,219 |
|
|
|
80,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity |
|
$ |
368,919 |
|
|
$ |
386,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
| |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
Cash flows from
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
$ |
1,826 |
|
|
$ |
(21,094 |
) |
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
23,517 |
|
|
|
25,824 |
|
|
Interest
amortization |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Deferred tax expense
(benefit) |
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
(12,274 |
) |
|
Gain on disposal of
property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,960 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Other |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
Change in
assets/liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
9,651 |
|
|
|
58,222 |
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(14,709 |
) |
|
|
34,885 |
|
|
Prepaid
expenses |
|
|
(5,568 |
) |
|
|
(1,527 |
) |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(1,944 |
) |
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
Accounts
payable |
|
|
(7,668 |
) |
|
|
(26,002 |
) |
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
|
(4,639 |
) |
|
|
6,423 |
|
|
Other
liabilities |
|
|
(9,130 |
) |
|
|
(5,887 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities |
|
|
(6,640 |
) |
|
|
57,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by
(used in) investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures |
|
|
(10,036 |
) |
|
|
(5,155 |
) |
|
Insurance proceeds
relating to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Cash used for methanol
dismantling |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in
investing activities |
|
|
(8,187 |
) |
|
|
(5,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayments on the
Revolver |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(17,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
(decrease) in cash |
|
|
(14,827 |
) |
|
|
34,414 |
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents – beginning of year |
|
|
42,197 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents – end of period |
|
$ |
27,370 |
|
|
$ |
36,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid, net of
interest income received |
|
$ |
5,428 |
|
|
$ |
5,864 |
|
|
Cash paid for income
taxes |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of
Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”) and reflect all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals)
which, in our opinion, are considered necessary for the fair presentation of the
results for the periods presented. The results of operations and cash flows for
the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the full year. These statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. The
accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have
been reviewed by Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public
accounting firm, whose report is included herein.
Reclassification
Certain amounts reported in the
consolidated financial statements for the prior periods have been reclassified
to conform to the current consolidated financial statement presentation with no
effect on net income (loss) or stockholders’ equity.
2. Stock-Based
Compensation
On December 19, 2002, we adopted
our 2002 Stock Plan and reserved 379,747 shares of our common stock for issuance
under the plan (subject to adjustment). Under our 2002 Stock Plan, officers and
key employees, as designated by our Board of Directors, may be issued stock
options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights or stock units. There are
currently options to purchase a total of 278,500 shares of our common stock
outstanding under our 2002 Stock Plan, all at an exercise price of $31.60, and
an additional 85,414 shares of common stock available for issuance under our
2002 Stock Plan.
On January 1, 2006, we adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123-Revised 2004,
“Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), using the modified prospective
method. SFAS No. 123(R) is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”), and supersedes
Accounting Principals Board No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees” (“APB No. 25”). Under SFAS No. 123(R), the cost of employee
services received in exchange for a stock-based award is determined based on the
grant-date fair value (with limited exceptions). That cost is then recognized
over the period during which the employee is required to provide services in
exchange for the award (usually the vesting period). We currently use an option
pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of stock-based awards.
Excess tax benefits, as defined in SFAS No. 123(R), are recognized as an
addition to paid-in capital.
On January 1, 2006, using the
modified prospective method under SFAS No. 123(R), we began recognizing
expense on any unvested awards under our 2002 Stock Plan that were granted prior
to that time and are expected to vest over their respective remaining vesting
periods. Any awards granted under our 2002 Stock Plan after December 31,
2005 will be expensed over the vesting period of the award. Stock based
compensation expense was $25,000 and $139,000 for the three and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
Prior to January 1, 2006, we had
adopted the “disclosure-only” provisions of SFAS No. 123 and accounted for
substantially all of our stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value
method prescribed in APB No. 25. Under APB No. 25, no compensation
expense was recognized for any of our stock option grants because all of the
stock options issued under our 2002 Stock Plan were granted with exercise prices
at estimated fair value at the time of grant. During March 2005, we issued
3,474 shares of our common stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options by
two of our former employees and, through the use of “net
exercise elections,” an additional
12,359 shares subject to the stock options held by these two former employees
were used to pay the exercise price and withholding taxes related to the option
exercises. The net exercise elections required variable accounting and resulted
in compensation expense of $0.2 million during the first quarter of 2005.
The following table illustrates the pro
forma effect on our net income and income per share attributable to common
stockholders for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005:
5
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
| |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share
Data) |
|
|
Net loss attributable
to common stockholders, as reported |
|
$ |
(10,835 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Stock-based
employee compensation expense included in reported net income (loss), net
of related tax effects |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Total
stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value
based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net
loss |
|
$ |
(10,945 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss
per share attributable to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
(3.83 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.28 |
) |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
(3.87 |
) |
|
|
(9.36 |
) |
3. Discontinued
Operations
On September 16, 2005, we
announced that we were exiting the acrylonitrile business and related derivative
operations, which included sodium cyanide and disodium iminodiacetic acid
(“DSIDA”). Our decision was based on a history of operating losses incurred by
our acrylonitrile and derivatives businesses, and was made after a full review
and analysis of our strategic alternatives. Our acrylonitrile and derivatives
businesses sustained losses in recent years and had been shut down since
February of 2005.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144,
“Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long Lived Assets,” we have
reported the operating results of these businesses as discontinued operations in
our consolidated statement of operations and cash flows, and we have presented
the assets and liabilities of these businesses separately in our consolidated
balance sheet.
The carrying amounts of the major
classes of assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations as of
September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
Assets of
discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable,
net |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of
discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
$ |
756 |
|
|
$ |
3,826 |
|
6
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Revenues and pre-tax losses from
discontinued operations for the three and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005 are presented below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
| |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
4,582 |
|
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
|
$ |
40,545 |
|
|
Loss before income
taxes |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
14,454 |
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
21,906 |
|
We expect to incur total costs of
$10 million related to our exit from the acrylonitrile and derivatives
businesses, of which approximately $9 million has been spent through
September 30, 2006. Changes in the accrued exit costs are detailed below
(in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Accrued as of |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued as of |
|
| |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
accruals |
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
Other |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Severance
accrual |
|
$ |
477 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
(646 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
DSIDA contractual
obligation |
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
DSIDA dismantling
costs |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
Product
payable |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
3,826 |
|
|
$ |
576 |
|
|
$ |
(3,874 |
) |
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Earnings Per
Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share
(“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus the assumed exercise
of all dilutive securities using the treasury stock method or the “if converted”
method, as appropriate. The following table provides a reconciliation of basic
and diluted EPS:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share
Data) |
|
|
Basic income
(loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
7,859 |
|
|
$ |
(1,671 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,078 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,362 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(9,164 |
) |
|
|
(1,127 |
) |
|
|
(13,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), net
of tax |
|
$ |
8,484 |
|
|
$ |
(10,835 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,205 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding |
|
|
2,828,460 |
|
|
|
2,828,474 |
|
|
|
2,828,462 |
|
|
|
2,827,566 |
|
|
Earnings per common
share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
2.78 |
|
|
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.37 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
(3.24 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(4.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
$ |
3.00 |
|
|
$ |
(3.83 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS—(Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Diluted income
(loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
7,859 |
|
|
$ |
(1,671 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,078 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,362 |
) |
|
Add: preferred stock
dividends |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to
common stockholders plus assumed conversions |
|
$ |
9,949 |
|
|
$ |
(1,671 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,078 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,362 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
(9,164 |
) |
|
|
(1,127 |
) |
|
|
(13,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) for
purposes of computing diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
10,574 |
|
|
$ |
(10,835 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,205 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
2,828,460 |
|
|
|
2,828,474 |
|
|
|
2,828,462 |
|
|
|
2,827,566 |
|
|
Dilutive impact of
preferred stock, if converted |
|
|
3,787,686 |
|
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
¯ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
6,616,146 |
|
|
|
2,828,474 |
|
|
|
2,828,462 |
|
|
|
2,827,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common
share assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.37 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from
discontinued operations |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
(3.24 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(4.91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
(3.83 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine-months ended
September 30, 2005, all outstanding stock options and warrants and
conversion of preferred stock are excluded from the computation as they were
anti-dilutive.
5. Inventories
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
Finished
products |
|
$ |
34,449 |
|
|
$ |
30,162 |
|
|
Raw materials |
|
|
13,429 |
|
|
|
7,974 |
|
|
Inventories under
exchange agreements |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
(2,807 |
) |
|
Stores and supplies,
net |
|
|
3,845 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,501 |
|
|
$ |
39,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Long-Term
Debt
On December 19, 2002, we issued
$94.3 million in original principal amount of our 10% Senior Secured Notes
due December 2007 (our “Secured Notes”). Our Secured Notes are senior
secured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our other
existing and future senior indebtedness, and senior in right of payment to all
of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness. Our Secured Notes are
guaranteed by Sterling Chemicals Energy, Inc. (“Sterling Energy”), our only
wholly-owned subsidiary. Sterling Energy’s guaranty ranks equally in right of
payment with all of its existing and future senior indebtedness, and senior in
right of payment to all of its existing and future subordinated indebtedness.
Our Secured Notes and Sterling Energy’s guaranty are secured by a first priority
lien on all of our production facilities and related assets.
8
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Our Secured Notes bear interest at an
annual rate of 10%, payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15
of each year. Until December 19, 2004, we were permitted under certain
circumstances to pay interest on our Secured Notes through the issuance of
additional Secured Notes rather than the payment of cash at an interest rate of
13 3/8 % per annum. In December 2003, we made an interest payment on our
Secured Notes at the higher rate through the issuance of $6.3 million in
original principal amount of additional Secured Notes, increasing the aggregate
principal amount of outstanding Secured Notes to $100.6 million. We have
made all other interest payments on our Secured Notes in cash.
We may redeem our Secured Notes at any
time at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount thereof
plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to compliance with the terms of our
Revolving Credit Agreement dated December 19, 2002 with The CIT
Group/Business Credit, Inc., as administrative agent and a lender, and certain
other lenders (our “Revolver”). In addition, in the event of a specified change
of control or the sale of our facility in Texas City, Texas, we are required to
offer to repurchase our Secured Notes at 101% of the outstanding principal
amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest. Under certain circumstances, we
are also required to use the proceeds of other asset sales to repurchase those
Secured Notes tendered by the holders at a price equal to 100% of the
outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The indenture governing our Secured
Notes contains numerous covenants and conditions, including, but not limited to,
restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens, sell assets,
make investments, make capital expenditures, engage in mergers and acquisitions
and pay dividends. The indenture also includes various circumstances and
conditions that would, upon their occurrence and subject in certain cases to
notice and grace periods, create an event of default thereunder. However, the
indenture does not require us to satisfy any financial ratios or maintenance
tests.
On December 19, 2002, we also
established our Revolver, which provides up to $100 million in revolving
credit loans, subject to borrowing base limitations. Our Revolver has an initial
term ending on September 19, 2007. Under our Revolver, we and Sterling
Energy are co-borrowers and are jointly and severally liable for any
indebtedness thereunder. Our Revolver is secured by first priority liens on all
of our accounts receivable, inventory and other specified assets, as well as all
of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Sterling Energy.
Borrowings under our Revolver bear
interest, at our option, at an annual rate of either the Alternate Base Rate
plus 0.75% or the “LIBO Rate” (as defined in our Revolver) plus 2.75%. The
“Alternate Base Rate” is equal to the greater of the “Base Rate” as announced
from time to time by JPMorgan Chase Bank in New York, New York or 0.50% per
annum above the latest “Federal Funds Rate” (as defined in our Revolver). The
average interest rate for borrowings under our Revolver for the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was 9.00% and 8.94%,
respectively. Under our Revolver, we are also required to pay an aggregate
commitment fee of 0.50% per year (payable monthly) on any unused portion of our
Revolver. Available credit under our Revolver is subject to a monthly borrowing
base of 85% of eligible accounts receivable plus the lesser of $50 million
and 65% of eligible inventory. In addition, the borrowing base for our Revolver
must exceed outstanding borrowings thereunder by $8 million at all times.
As of September 30, 2006, total credit available under our Revolver was
limited to $54 million due to these borrowing base limitations. As of
September 30, 2006, there were no loans outstanding under our Revolver, and
we had $3 million in outstanding letters of credit issued pursuant to our
Revolver. Based on the maturity date of the Revolver, and pursuant to Emerging
Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-22, “Balance Sheet Classification of
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Agreements That Include both a Subjective
Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement,” any balances outstanding under
our Revolver are classified as a current portion of long-term debt.
Our Revolver contains numerous
covenants and conditions, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our
ability to incur indebtedness, create liens, sell assets, make investments, make
capital expenditures, engage in mergers and acquisitions and pay dividends. Our
Revolver also contains a covenant that requires us to earn a specified amount of
earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (as
defined in our Revolver) on a monthly basis if, for 15 consecutive days, unused
availability under our Revolver plus cash on hand is less than $20 million. Our
Revolver includes various circumstances and conditions that would, upon their
occurrence and subject in certain cases to notice and grace periods, create an
event of default thereunder.
We believe that our cash on hand,
together with credit available under our Revolver, will be sufficient to meet
our short-term liquidity needs, although our liquidity may not be adequate
during any particular period. The stated term of our Revolver ends on
September 19, 2007 and our Secured Notes become due on December 19,
2007. We have commenced discussions to renew or replace our Revolver and
refinance the indebtedness under our Secured Notes prior to their stated
maturities, either on a stand-alone basis or as part of a larger strategic
corporate transaction, although we may not be successful in doing so.
9
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS—(Continued)
7. Commitments and
Contingencies
Product
Contracts:
We have certain long-term agreements
that provide for the dedication of 100% of our production of acetic acid and
plasticizers, each to one customer. We also have various sales and conversion
agreements, which dedicate significant portions of our production of styrene to
various customers. Some of these agreements provide for cost recovery plus an
agreed profit margin based upon market prices. A significant portion of our
existing styrene sales contracts will expire in the next nine months. The stated
term of one of these contracts, which represents a significant portion of our
current North America committed sales volumes, expires at the end of this year
and we do not expect that contract to be renewed. We are currently pursuing
renewals of our other contracts that expire in 2007, as well as additional
contract volumes with new customers. We may not be successful in renewing these
expiring contracts or obtaining new contract customers. If we are unsuccessful,
we may lower our styrene production levels or sell more of our styrene
production in the spot markets, both domestic and export, which could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
Environmental
Regulations:
Our operations involve the handling,
production, transportation, treatment and disposal of materials that are
classified as hazardous or toxic waste and that are extensively regulated by
environmental and health and safety laws, regulations and permit requirements.
Environmental permits required for our operations are subject to periodic
renewal and can be revoked or modified for cause or when new or revised
environmental requirements are implemented. Changing and increasingly strict
environmental requirements can affect the manufacture, handling, processing,
distribution and use of our products and, if so affected, our business and
operations may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, changes in
environmental requirements can cause us to incur substantial costs in upgrading
or redesigning our facilities and processes, including our waste treatment,
storage, disposal and other waste handling practices and equipment.
A business risk inherent in chemical
operations is the potential for personal injury and property damage claims from
employees, contractors and their employees and nearby landowners and occupants.
While we believe our business operations and facilities generally are operated
in compliance with all applicable environmental and health and safety
requirements in all material respects, we cannot be sure that past practices or
future operations will not result in material claims or regulatory action,
require material environmental expenditures or result in exposure or injury
claims by employees, contractors and their employees and the public. Some risk
of environmental costs and liabilities is inherent in our operations and
products, as it is with other companies engaged in similar businesses.
We have incurred, and may continue to
incur, liability for investigation and cleanup of waste or contamination at our
own facilities or at facilities operated by third parties where we have disposed
of waste. We continually review all estimates of potential environmental
liabilities but we may not have identified or fully assessed all potential
liabilities arising out of our past or present operations or the amount
necessary to investigate and remediate any conditions that may be significant to
us.
Air emissions from our Texas City
facility are subject to certain permit requirements and self-implementing
emission limitations and standards under state and federal laws. Our Texas City
facility is located in an area that the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)
has classified as not having attained the ambient air quality standards for
ozone, which is controlled by direct regulation of volatile organic compounds
and nitrogen oxide (“NOx”). Our Texas City facility is also subject to the
federal government’s June 1997 National Ambient Air Quality Standards,
which lower the ozone and particulate matter threshold for attainment. The Texas
Commission for Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”) has imposed strict requirements on
regulated facilities, including our Texas City facility, to ensure that the air
quality control region will achieve the ambient air quality standards for ozone.
Local authorities also may impose new ozone and particulate matter standards.
Compliance with these stricter standards may substantially increase our future
NOx, volatile organic compounds and particulate matter control costs, the amount
and full impact of which cannot be determined at this time.
On December 13, 2002, the TCEQ
adopted a revised State Implementation Plan (“SIP”) to achieve compliance with
the “1 hour” ozone standard of the Clean Air Act. The EPA has recently approved
this “1 hour” SIP, which calls for reduction of emissions of NOx at our Texas
City facility by approximately 80% by the end of 2007. The current SIP also
requires monitoring of emissions of highly reactive volatile organic carbons
(“HRVOCs”), such as ethylene. The cost of compliance with the “1 hour” SIP at
our Texas City facility is estimated to be between $12 million and
$14 million. This estimate includes our share of capital
10
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS—(Continued)
expenditures needed to
be made by S&L Cogeneration Company, a 50/50 joint venture between us and
Praxair Energy Resources, Inc. (“Praxair”). To date we have spent
$9.9 million in capital on NOx reductions and HRVOC monitoring, with
$0.6 million of that amount being spent during the first three quarters of
2006. In April 2004, the Houston-Galveston region was designated a moderate
non-attainment area with respect to the “8-hour” ozone standard of the Clean Air
Act, and compliance with this standard is required no later than June 15,
2010. The TCEQ is currently drafting another revision to the SIP in order to
achieve compliance with the 8-hour ozone standard. Potential control strategies
for this “8-hour SIP” are being reviewed by the TCEQ, and adoption of additional
regulations is expected in May 2007. These revisions to the SIP are
expected to be submitted to the EPA for approval in June 2007, and may
require that emissions of NOx be reduced by 90% by January 1, 2009, as well
as further reductions or additional monitoring of HRVOC emissions. We estimate
that an additional $14 million to $16 million in capital improvements
would be required to meet these new requirements. A small portion of these costs
may be recovered from the other parties to our production agreements.
Legal
Proceedings:
On July 16, 2001, Sterling
Chemicals Holdings, Inc., and most of its U.S. subsidiaries, including us
(collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas. The Debtors’ plan of reorganization
(our “Plan of Reorganization”) was confirmed on November 20, 2002 and, on
December 19, 2002, the Debtors emerged from bankruptcy pursuant to the
terms of our Plan of Reorganization.
On July 5, 2005, Patrick B.
McCarthy, an employee of Kinder-Morgan, Inc., was seriously injured at
Kinder-Morgan’s facilities near Cincinnati, Ohio, while attempting to offload a
railcar containing one of our plasticizers products. The incident is being
investigated and the underlying cause of the accident is not yet known. On
October 28, 2005, Mr. McCarthy and his family filed a suit in the
Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio (Case No. A0509144) against
us, BASF Corporation and five other defendants seeking over $0.5 million in
damages related to medical expenses and loss of earnings and earnings capacity,
among other things, and punitive damages. At this time, it is impossible to
determine the extent of, or whether we will have any, liability for this
incident and we will vigorously defend the suit. We believe that all, or
substantially all, of any liability imposed upon us as a result of this suit and
our related out-of-pocket costs and expenses will be covered by our insurance
policies, subject to a $1 million deductible. We do not believe that this
incident will have a material adverse affect on our business, financial
position, results of operations or cash flows, although we cannot guarantee that
a material adverse effect will not occur.
On August 17, 2006, we initiated
an arbitration proceeding against BP Amoco Chemical Corporation (“BP Chemicals”)
to resolve a dispute involving the interpretation of provisions of our acetic
acid production agreement with BP Chemicals. Under the production agreement, BP
Chemicals reimburses our manufacturing expenses and pays us a percentage of the
profits derived from the sales of the acetic acid we produce. Historically, the
costs of manufacturing charged to our acetic acid business, and reimbursed by BP
Chemicals, included the amounts we paid Praxair for carbon monoxide, hydrogen
and a blend of carbon monoxide and hydrogen commonly referred to as “blend gas”.
Our acetic acid business has always used all of the carbon monoxide produced by
Praxair other than the small amount of carbon monoxide included in the blend
gas. Until recently, all of the blend gas produced by Praxair was used by the
oxo-alcohols plant included in our plasticizers business. During the period when
the oxo-alcohols plant was operating, BP Chemicals was compensated for the use
of this blend gas by our oxo-alcohols plant through a credit to the amount of
our manufacturing expenses reimbursed by BP Chemicals. Effective July 1,
2006, we permanently closed our oxo-alcohols plant. BP Chemicals is now taking
the position that it is entitled to continue to deduct a portion of the blend
gas credit from the reimbursement of our manufacturing expenses, even though our
oxo-alcohols plant has been closed and is no longer taking any blend gas and the
Praxair facilities have been modified so that the carbon monoxide previously
used in blend gas is now being delivered to our acetic acid operations.
Effective as of July 1, 2006, BP Chemicals began short paying our invoices
for manufacturing expenses by the portion of the credit that BP Chemicals now
claims will continue until July 31, 2016. The disputed portion of the
credit is averaging approximately $0.3 million per month during 2006. We
are also seeking additional damages from BP Chemicals in the arbitration based
on what we believe are breaches of duty by BP Chemicals. A date for the
arbitration hearing has not yet been set, although we expect the hearings to
occur during the first quarter of 2007. The arbitration process is in its
initial stages, with each side having selected their respective neutral
arbitrator. We believe that our acetic acid production agreement does not
contemplate the continuation of any portion of the blend gas credit under these
circumstances and will vigorously pursue our position in the arbitration.
We are subject to various other claims
and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We do not
believe that any of these claims and actions, separately or in the aggregate,
will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results
of operation or cash flows, although we cannot guarantee that a material adverse
effect will not occur.
11
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Other:
Our styrene facilities consist of two
trains, a north train and a south train. On September 22, 2005, during a shut
down of our plant in anticipation of Hurricane Rita, the superheater in the
south train of our styrene facilities was significantly damaged in a fire,
forcing a closure of the south train until repairs could be completed. In
addition, the north train of our styrene facilities sustained internal damage as
a result of this incident and, although still capable of producing product, the
damage caused significant raw material yield and energy inefficiencies. On
January 12, 2006, we shut down the north train of our styrene facilities to
make repairs to the reactor and replace the existing catalyst. In
February 2006, both the north and south trains were re-started. During the
shutdowns, we fully met our supply obligations to our contract styrene customers
through the operation of the north train of our styrene facilities, supplemented
by open market purchases of styrene. The total cost for these repairs was
approximately $11 million. We also filed a claim for approximately
$12 million under our business interruption insurance policies. During the
second quarter of 2006, we received an advance payment from our insurance
companies of $3 million. In August 2006, we settled the claim with our
insurance carriers for a total of $15 million, including the
$3 million advance payment. We recognized the incremental $12 million claim
settlement as income during the third quarter of 2006. Of the $12 million
incremental claim settlement, approximately half was received during
September 2006, with the remainder received prior to November 2, 2006.
8. Pension Plans
and Other Postretirement Benefits
Net periodic pension costs consisted of
the following components:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
606 |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
5,425 |
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
Expected return on plan
assets |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,667 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
|
|
(5,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension
costs |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement benefits costs
consisted of the following components:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
Amortization of
unrecognized costs. |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
Curtailment
gain |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan costs of
continuing operations |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
Curtailment gain from
discontinued operations |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net plan costs |
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
(1,479 |
) |
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
(1,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. New Accounting
Standards
In September 2005, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 04-13, “Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same
Counterparty” (“EITF No. 04-13”). EITF No. 04-13 provides that two or
more legally separate exchange transactions with the same counterparty should be
combined and considered as a single arrangement for purposes of applying
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions,” when the transactions were entered into in contemplation of one
another. EITF No. 04-13 contains several indicators to be considered in
assessing whether two transactions are entered into in contemplation of one
another. If, based on consideration of the indicators and the substance of the
arrangement, two transactions are combined and considered a single
12
STERLING
CHEMICALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS—(Continued)
arrangement, an
exchange of finished goods inventory for either raw material inventory or
work-in-process inventory should be accounted for at fair value. The provisions
of EITF No. 04-13 were effective for transactions beginning April 1,
2006. Adoption of EITF No. 04-13 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes–an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”) to clarify the
accounting for uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This interpretation
prescribes a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring tax benefits and
requires explicit disclosure of any uncertain tax position. FIN 48 is effective
for us on January 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating what impact, if any,
the adoption of FIN 48 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS No. 158”). SFAS No. 158 requires the
recognition of the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit
plans on the balance sheet. The overfunded or underfunded status would be
recognized as an asset or liability on the balance sheet with changes occurring
during the current year reflected through the comprehensive income portion of
equity. SFAS No. 158 will also require the measurement date of the funded
status of our defined benefit postretirement plans match the date of our fiscal
year-end financial statements, eliminating the use of earlier measurement dates
that were previously permissible. We will be required to initially recognize the
funded status of our defined benefit postretirement plan and provide the
required disclosures as of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. The
requirement to measure the assets and benefit obligations of our defined benefit
postretirement plans as of the date of our fiscal year-end statement of
financial position will be effective for our fiscal year ending
December 31, 2008.
In September 2006, the Securities
and Exchanged Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
“Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108
provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal
of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year
misstatement. The SEC staff believes that registrants should quantify errors
using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether
either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant
quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. We will adopt
SAB 108 for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 and do not believe
that SAB 108 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
13
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of
Directors and Stockholders of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.:
We have reviewed the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. and its
subsidiary (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2006, and the related
condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and of cash flows for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. These interim
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance
with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in
scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware
of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated
financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of
December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity (deficiency in assets), and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 16, 2006, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it
has been derived.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP
Houston,
Texas
November 10, 2006
14
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read
in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements (including
the Notes thereto) included in Item 1, Part I of this report.
Business
Overview
We are a leading North American
producer of selected petrochemicals used to manufacture a wide array of consumer
goods and industrial products throughout the world. Our primary products are
styrene, acetic acid and plasticizers. Styrene is a commodity chemical used to
produce intermediate products such as polystyrene, expandable polystyrene resins
and ABS plastics, which are used in a wide variety of products such as household
goods, foam cups and containers, disposable food service items, toys, packaging
and other consumer and industrial products. Approximately 50% of our styrene
capacity is currently committed for sales in North America under long-standing
customer relationships. The balance of our capacity is available to produce
styrene for sales throughout the world when market conditions warrant. A
significant portion of our existing styrene sales contracts will expire in the
next nine months. The stated term of one of these contracts, which represents a
significant portion of our current North America committed sales volumes,
expires at the end of this year and we do not expect that contract to be
renewed. We are currently pursuing renewals of our other contracts that expire
in 2007, as well as additional contract volumes with new customers. We may not
be successful in renewing these expiring contracts or obtaining new contract
customers. If we are unsuccessful, we may lower our styrene production levels or
sell more of our styrene production in the spot markets, both domestic and
export, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
Acetic acid is used primarily to
produce vinyl acetate monomer, which is used in a variety of products, including
adhesives and surface coatings. All of our acetic acid production is sold to BP
Amoco Chemical Company (“BP Chemicals”) pursuant to a long-term contract that
extends until 2016, which has provided us with a stable, steadily increasing
source of income since the inception of this relationship in 1986. All of our
plasticizers, which are used to make flexible plastics, such as shower curtains,
floor coverings, automotive parts and construction materials, are sold to BASF
Corporation (“BASF”) pursuant to a long-term production agreement that expires
in 2013, subject to some limited early termination rights held by BASF.
We generally sell our petrochemicals
products to customers for use in the manufacture of other chemicals and
products, which in turn are used in the production of a wide array of consumer
goods and industrial products throughout the world. Styrene is a commodity and
exhibits wide swings in prices and profit margins based upon current and
anticipated levels of supply and demand. The acetic acid industry tends to sell
most of its products through long-term sales agreements having “cost plus”
pricing mechanisms, which eliminates much of the volatility seen in other
petrochemicals products and results in more stable and predictable earnings and
profit margins. Although exceptions occasionally occur, as a general rule, if
styrene profit margins are favorable, our overall financial performance is good,
but our overall financial performance suffers when styrene margins are
unfavorable. The market for styrene roughly follows repetitive cycles, and
general trends in the supply and demand balance may be observed over time.
However, it is difficult, if not impossible, to definitively predict when market
conditions will be favorable or unfavorable.
The financial performance of each of
our products is primarily a function of sales prices, the cost of raw materials
and energy and sales volumes. While changes in the prices for our products may
be tracked through a variety of sources, a change in price does not necessarily
result in a corresponding change in our financial performance. When the prices
of our products increase or decrease, our overall financial performance may
improve, decline or stay roughly the same depending upon the extent and
direction of changes in our costs for raw materials and energy and our
production rates. For most of our products, the combined cost of raw materials
and energy resources is far greater than all other costs of production combined.
We use significant amounts of natural gas as fuel in the production of our
products, and the producers of most of our raw materials use significant amounts
of natural gas in their production. As a result, our production and raw
materials costs increase or decrease based upon changes in the price for natural
gas. Natural gas and most of our raw materials are commodities and,
consequently, are subject to wide fluctuations in prices, which can, and often
do, move independently of changes in the prices for our products. Prices for,
and the availability of, natural gas and many of our raw materials are largely
based on regional factors, which can result in wide disparities in prices in
different parts of the world or shortages or unavailability in some regions at
the same time when these products are plentiful in other parts of the world.
Prices for styrene, on the other hand, tend to be more consistent throughout the
world, after taking into account transportation costs. Consequently, changes in
prices for natural gas and raw materials tend to impact the margin on our sales
rather than the price of our products, with margins increasing when natural gas
and raw materials costs decline and vice versa. In addition, many producers in
other parts of the world use oil-based processes rather than natural gas-based
processes. The relationship between the price of crude oil and the price of
natural gas can either increase or decrease our competitiveness depending on
their relative values at any particular point in time. Sales volumes influence
our overall financial performance in a variety of ways. As a general rule,
increases in sales volumes will result in an increase in overall revenues and
vice versa, although this is not necessarily the case since the prices for some
of our products can change dramatically from month-to-month. More importantly,
changes in production rates impact the average cost per pound of the products
produced. If more
15
pounds are produced,
our fixed costs are spread over a greater number of pounds resulting in a lower
average cost to produce each pound. In addition, our production rates influence
the overall efficiency of our manufacturing unit and the yields we receive from
our raw materials.
Styrene sales prices during the third
quarter of 2006 increased significantly compared to the second quarter of 2006,
in large part due to increasing benzene prices. The rapidly increasing styrene
sales prices during the third quarter of 2006 contributed to positive gross
margins in styrene for the period, as a significant amount of our styrene was
produced using lower-priced benzene as a raw material and was then sold in the
ensuing month when styrene prices had increased. This impact resulted in an
increase in gross profit of approximately $5 million during the quarter.
Contract benzene prices trended up from January through July 2006 and then
decreased somewhat during the rest of the third quarter, as depicted in the
chart below:
Source: Chemical
Marketing Associates, Inc. (“CMAI”)
Depending on market conditions, benzene
contract prices may be either higher or lower than benzene spot prices. As we
purchase a portion of our benzene requirements priced on a contract basis and
the remainder priced on a spot basis, the actual prices for our benzene
purchases is not exactly the same as shown in the table above. Our actual
benzene costs did, however, follow similar trends. As the combined cost of raw
materials and energy resources is far greater than the total of all other costs
of styrene production, with the cost of benzene having the greatest impact on
overall styrene manufacturing costs, high benzene prices have continued to make
it difficult for United States’ styrene producers to realize meaningful margin
improvements on their styrene sales.
Over the last five years, China has
been the driver for growth in styrene demand, representing around 75% of the
world’s new styrene demand in that period. Historically, we have positioned
ourselves to take advantage of peaks in the Asian styrene markets, with only 50%
of our styrene capacity being committed under long-term arrangements. However,
over the last two years, relatively high benzene and natural gas prices have
significantly limited our ability to sell styrene into the Asian markets, and
high styrene prices have reduced styrene global demand growth rates. We expect
these dynamics to continue throughout 2006. Further complicating our ability to
sell styrene into the Asian markets is the announcement by several of our
competitors of their intention to build new styrene production units outside the
United States during the late 2006 to 2008 time frame. In 2006, our competitors
added approximately 2 billion pounds of new styrene capacity in Asia. Most
of the remaining announced construction projects appear likely to start up
during 2007 and 2008, although it is not uncommon for announced construction to
be delayed. In addition, much of this new capacity is being constructed in
politically unstable regions of the world, such as the Middle East, which may
impact the start-up of this new capacity. If and when these new units are
completed, we would anticipate more difficult market conditions, especially in
the export markets, until the additional supply is absorbed by growth in market
demand.
Given the market conditions in the
Asian markets and the high domestic raw materials and energy costs we have been
experiencing, most of our styrene sales over the last two years have been made
to customers in NAFTA countries and South America. We expect most our styrene
sales over the next three to five years to also be in these geographic regions.
Consequently, we are focusing our efforts on increasing market share in these
areas, while continuing to make occasional styrene sales in Asia on an
opportunistic basis. We may not, however, be successful in increasing our market
share in these geographic regions during this period and we cannot guarantee
when, or if, market conditions for North American styrene producers will improve
in Asia.
Our styrene facilities consist of two
trains, a north train and a south train. On September 22, 2005, during a shut
down of our plant in anticipation of Hurricane Rita, the superheater in the
south train of our styrene facilities was significantly damaged in a fire,
forcing a closure of the south train until repairs could be completed. In
addition, the north train of our styrene facilities sustained internal damage as
a result of this incident and, although still capable of producing product, the
damage caused significant raw material yield and energy inefficiencies. On
January 12, 2006, we shut down the north train of our styrene facilities to
make repairs to the reactor and replace the existing catalyst. In
February 2006, both the north and south trains were re-
16
started. During the
shutdowns, we fully met our supply obligations to our contract styrene customers
through the operation of the north train of our styrene facilities, supplemented
by open market purchases of styrene. The total cost for these repairs was
approximately $11 million. We also filed a claim for approximately
$12 million under our business interruption insurance policies. During the
second quarter of 2006, we received an advance payment from our insurance
companies of $3 million. In August 2006, we settled the claim with our
insurance carriers for a total of $15 million, including the
$3 million advance payment. We recognized the incremental $12 million claim
settlement as income during the third quarter of 2006. Of the $12 million
incremental claim settlement, approximately half was received during
September 2006, with the remainder received prior to November 2, 2006.
Margins for acetic acid have grown
steadily over the past several years, with this trend continuing for the first
nine months of 2006. We also expect demand to remain robust throughout 2007. The
North American acetic acid market is mature and well developed, with demand
being linked to the demand for vinyl acetate monomer, a key intermediate in the
production of a wide array of polymers. Vinyl acetate monomer is the largest
derivative of acetic acid, representing over 40% of total demand. From 2005 to
2009, global production of vinyl acetate monomer is expected to increase from
7.3 billion pounds to 8.3 billion pounds. The acetic acid industry
tends to sell most of its products through long term sales agreements having
“cost plus” pricing mechanisms, which eliminates much of the volatility seen in
other petrochemicals products and results in more stable and predictable
earnings and profit margins. All of our acetic acid production is sold to BP
Chemicals under a long-term production agreement that extends until at least
2016. Under the production agreement, BP Chemicals markets all of the acetic
acid we produce and pays us, among other amounts, a portion of the profits
earned from their sales of our acetic acid.
Historically, we have produced linear
plasticizers, which typically receive a premium over competing branched
propylene-based products for customers that require enhanced performance
properties. However, the markets for competing plasticizers can be affected by
the cost of the underlying raw materials, especially when the cost of one olefin
rises faster than the other, or by the introduction of new products. One of
these raw materials for linear plasticizers is a product known as linear alpha
olefins. Over the last few years, the price of linear alpha olefins has
increased sharply, which has caused many consumers to switch to lower cost
branched propylene-based products and C4-based products, despite the loss of
some performance properties. Ultimately, we expect branched plasticizers to
replace linear plasticizers for most applications over the long-term. As a
result, we modified our plasticizers facilities to produce lower cost branched
plasticizers products during the third quarter of 2006.
In 2005, BP Chemicals announced the
permanent closure of its linear alpha-olefins production facility in Pasadena,
Texas, the primary source of linear alpha olefins to the oxo-alcohols production
unit of our plasticizers facility. On April 28, 2006, BASF Corporation
(“BASF”) notified us that it was exercising its right under our Second Amended
and Restated Plasticizers Production Agreement to terminate its future
obligations with respect to the operation of our oxo-alcohols production unit,
effective as of July 31, 2006. After pursuing various alternative uses for
our oxo-alcohols unit, we were unable to secure an alternative use for this
facility. As a result, we permanently shut down our oxo-alcohols production unit
on July 30, 2006. This shutdown did not result in any layoffs, as personnel
assigned to our oxo-alcohol unit were redeployed to other positions at our Texas
City facility. Due to the closure of our oxo-alcohol unit, our phthalate esters
unit now uses oxo-alcohols supplied by BASF that have a different chemical
composition. We do not expect the closure of our oxo-alcohol unit to have a
material effect on our financial condition, results of operation or cash flows.
In addition, due to the oxo-alcohols long-lived assets having a book value of
zero, no impairment charges were required as a result of this closure.
Results of
Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to Three
Months Ended September 30, 2005
Revenues and Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Our revenues were $190 million for
the third quarter of 2006, a 28% increase from the $149 million in revenues we
recorded for the third quarter of 2005. This increase in revenues was primarily
driven by an increase in styrene sales prices and acetic acid sales. We recorded
net income from continuing operations of $10 million for the third quarter
of 2006, compared to the net income of $0.1 million that we recorded in the
third quarter of 2005. Our improved financial performance in the third quarter
of 2006 resulted primarily from higher styrene and acetic margins, higher acetic
sales volumes and a $12 million gain we recorded from the insurance
settlements filed against our property damage and business interruption
insurance policies related to the fire that occurred in our styrene unit in
September 2005.
Revenues from our styrene operations
were $150 million for the third quarter of 2006, an increase of 24% from
the $122 million in revenues we received from these operations for the
third quarter of 2005. This increase in revenues from our styrene operations was
primarily due to higher sales prices. During the third quarter of 2006, the
prices we paid for benzene, one of the primary raw materials required for
styrene production, increased 28% from the prices we paid for benzene during the
third quarter of 2005, and the prices we paid for ethylene, the other primary
raw material required for styrene production, increased 23% from
17
the prices we paid for
ethylene during the third quarter of 2005. The average price we paid for natural
gas for the third quarter of 2006 decreased 23% compared to the average price we
paid for natural gas during the third quarter of 2005.
Revenues from acetic acid and
plasticizers were $40 million for the third quarter of 2006 compared to the
$27 million in revenues we received from these operations during the third
quarter of 2005. This increase in revenues was comprised of a 51% increase in
acetic acid revenues and a 35% increase in plasticizer revenues. The increase in
acetic revenues resulted primarily from increased sales volumes of acetic acid
in the third quarter of 2006, in large part due to the lack of production in the
third quarter of 2005 due to a maintenance shutdown, as well as higher margins
in the 2006 period. Additionally, acetic acid revenues also increased by
$2.4 million in the third quarter of 2006 in connection with an adjustment
to previously incorrectly billed items. In December 2005, we amended our
plasticizers production agreement with BASF to among other things, eliminate the
provisions providing for the sharing of profits and losses from this business
between us and BASF. The increase in plasticizer revenues in the third quarter
of 2006 primarily resulted from the absence of an accrual for the losses from
this business we shared with BASF during the third quarter of 2005.
Other Income
We recorded $12 million in other
income during the third quarter of 2006, which primarily consisted of
recognition of the final settlement of our claims under our insurance policies
related to the fire that occurred in our styrene unit in September 2005.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
During the third quarter of 2006, we
recorded a $10 million provision for income taxes from continuing
operations compared to a less than $1 million provision for income taxes
from continuing operations for the third quarter of 2005. This difference was
due to our increased net income and certain return to accrual adjustments in
connection with the filing of our 2005 federal income tax return in the third
quarter of 2006.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2005
Revenues and Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
Our revenues were $477 million for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, compared to the
$492 million in revenues we received during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005. This 3% decrease in revenues resulted primarily from
lower styrene volumes due to the shutdown of our styrene unit in the first
quarter of 2006 to repair the damage caused by the September 22, 2005 fire
discussed above. We recorded a net income from continuing operations of
$3 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006,
compared to a net loss of $7 million during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005.
Revenues from our styrene operations
were $366 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.
This represents a decrease of 10% from the $407 million in revenues we
received from these operations for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005. This decrease in revenues from our styrene operations
was due to lower production from our styrene production facility during the
shutdown of that facility in the first quarter of 2006 to repair the damage
caused by the September 22, 2005 fire discussed above. As a part of normal
recurring operations, each of our manufacturing units is completely shut down
from time to time, for a period typically lasting two to four weeks, to replace
catalysts and perform major maintenance work required to sustain long-term
production. These periods are commonly referred to as “turnarounds” or
“shutdowns.” While actual timing is subject to a number of variables,
turnarounds of our styrene unit typically occur every two to three years. As our
styrene production facility was already shut down in the first quarter of 2006
to repair the damage caused by the September 2005 fire discussed above, we
decided to perform our normal recurring styrene turnaround earlier than planned.
We expense the costs of turnarounds as the associated expenses are incurred. As
expenses for turnarounds, especially for our styrene unit, can be significant,
the impact of turnarounds can be material for financial reporting periods during
which the turnarounds actually occur. During the first quarter of 2006, we
incurred approximately $9 million of expenses associated with this
turnaround of our styrene unit. During the first three quarters of 2006, prices
for benzene and ethylene, the two primary raw materials required for styrene
production, increased 5% and 17%, respectively, from the prices we paid for
these products in the first three quarters of 2005. The average price we paid
for natural gas for the first three quarters of 2006 decreased 7% from the
average price we paid for natural gas during the same period in 2005.
Revenues from acetic acid and
plasticizers were $111 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2006 and $85 million for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005. This increase in revenues was comprised of a 27%
increase in acetic acid revenues and a 37% increase in plasticizer revenues. The
increase in acetic revenues resulted primarily from increased sales volumes of
acetic acid in the third quarter of 2006, in large part due to the lack of
production in the third quarter of 2005 due to a maintenance shutdown, as well
as higher margins in the 2006 period. Additionally, acetic acid revenues also
increased by $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2006 in connection with
an adjustment to previously incorrectly billed items. In December 2005, we
18
amended our
plasticizers production agreement with BASF to among other things, eliminate the
provisions providing for the sharing of profits and losses from this business
between us and BASF. The increase in plasticizer revenues in the third quarter
of 2006 primarily resulted from the absence of an accrual for the losses from
this business we shared with BASF during the third quarter of 2005.
Other Income
We recorded $16 million in other
income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, which primarily
consisted of the recognition of final settlement of our claims under our
property damage and business interruption insurance policies related to the fire
that occurred in our styrene unit in September 2005.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
During the nine-months ended
September 2006, we recorded a $6 million provision for income taxes
from continuing operations compared to a $4 million benefit for income
taxes from continuing operations for the third quarter of 2005. This difference
was due to our increased net income from continuing operations, in large part
due to the insurance settlement mentioned above and certain return to accrual
adjustments in connection with the filing of our 2005 federal income tax return
during the nine-months ended September 2006.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
On December 19, 2002, we issued
$94.3 million in original principal amount of our Secured Notes. Our
Secured Notes are senior secured obligations and rank equally in right of
payment with all of our other existing and future senior indebtedness, and
senior in right of payment to all of our existing and future subordinated
indebtedness. Our Secured Notes are guaranteed by Sterling Energy, our only
wholly owned subsidiary. Sterling Energy’s guaranty ranks equally in right of
payment with all of its existing and future senior indebtedness, and senior in
right of payment to all of its existing and future subordinated indebtedness.
Our Secured Notes and Sterling Energy’s guaranty are secured by a first priority
lien on all of our production facilities and related assets.
Our Secured Notes bear interest at an
annual rate of 10%, payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15
of each year. Until December 19, 2004, we were permitted under certain
circumstances to pay interest on our Secured Notes through the issuance of
additional Secured Notes rather than the payment of cash at an interest rate of
13 3 / 8 % per annum. In December 2003, we made an interest payment on our
Secured Notes at the higher rate through the issuance of $6.3 million in
original principal amount of additional Secured Notes, increasing the aggregate
principal amount of outstanding Secured Notes to $100.6 million. We have
made all other interest payments on our Secured Notes in cash. We may redeem our
Secured Notes at any time at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding
principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to compliance
with the terms of our Revolver. In addition, in the event of a specified change
of control or the sale of our facility in Texas City, Texas, we are required to
offer to repurchase our Secured Notes at 101% of the outstanding principal
amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest. Under certain circumstances, we
are also required to use the proceeds of other asset sales to repurchase those
Secured Notes tendered by the holders at a price equal to 100% of the
outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The indenture governing our Secured
Notes contains numerous covenants and conditions, including, but not limited to,
restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens, sell assets,
make investments, make capital expenditures, engage in mergers and acquisitions
and pay dividends. The indenture also includes various circumstances and
conditions that would, upon their occurrence and subject in certain cases to
notice and grace periods, create an event of default thereunder. However, the
indenture does not require us to satisfy any financial ratios or maintenance
tests.
On December 19, 2002, we also
established our Revolver, which provides up to $100 million in revolving
credit loans, subject to borrowing base limitations. Our Revolver has an initial
term ending on September 19, 2007. Under our Revolver, we and Sterling
Energy are co-borrowers and are jointly and severally liable for any
indebtedness thereunder. Our Revolver is secured by first priority liens on all
of our accounts receivable, inventory and other specified assets, as well as all
of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Sterling Energy.
Borrowings under our Revolver bear
interest, at our option, at an annual rate of either the Alternate Base Rate
plus 0.75% or the “LIBO Rate” (as defined in our Revolver) plus 2.75%. The
“Alternate Base Rate” is equal to the greater of the “Base Rate” as announced
from time to time by JPMorgan Chase Bank in New York, New York or 0.50% per
annum above the latest “Federal Funds Rate” (as defined in our Revolver). The
average interest rate for borrowings under our Revolver for the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was 9.00% and 8.94%,
respectively. Under our Revolver, we are also required to pay an aggregate
commitment fee of 0.50% per year (payable monthly) on any unused portion.
Available credit is subject to a monthly
19
borrowing base of 85%
of eligible accounts receivable plus the lesser of $50 million and 65% of
eligible inventory. In addition, the borrowing base for our Revolver must exceed
outstanding borrowings thereunder by $8 million at all times. As of
September 30, 2006, total credit available under our Revolver was limited
to $54 million due to these borrowing base limitations. As of
September 30, 2006, there were no loans outstanding under our Revolver, and
we had $3 million in letters of credit outstanding.
Our Revolver contains numerous
covenants and conditions, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our
ability to incur indebtedness, create liens, sell assets, make investments, make
capital expenditures, engage in mergers and acquisitions and pay dividends. Our
Revolver also contains a covenant that requires us to earn a specified amount of
earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (as
defined in our Revolver) on a monthly basis if, for 15 consecutive days, unused
availability under our Revolver plus cash on hand is less than $20 million. Our
Revolver includes various circumstances and conditions that would, upon their
occurrence and subject in certain cases to notice and grace periods, create an
event of default thereunder.
Our liquidity (i.e., cash and cash
equivalents plus total credit available under our Revolver) was $79 million
at September 30, 2006, a decrease of $8 million compared to our
liquidity at December 31, 2005. This decrease primarily resulted from
expenses associated with the maintenance turnaround and repairs to our styrene
facility performed during the first quarter of 2006. The total cost of this
turnaround and the repairs, including maintenance expense, catalyst installation
and capital projects, was approximately $15 million. We believe that our
cash on hand, together with credit available under our Revolver, will be
sufficient to meet our short-term liquidity needs, although our liquidity may
not be adequate during any particular period. The stated term of our Revolver
ends on September 19, 2007 and our Secured Notes become due on
December 19, 2007. We have commenced discussions to renew or replace our
Revolver and refinance the indebtedness under our Secured Notes prior to their
stated maturities, either on a stand-alone basis or as part of a larger
strategic corporate transaction, although we may not be successful in doing so.
Working Capital
Our working capital, excluding assets
and liabilities from discontinued operations, was $86 million on
September 30, 2006, an increase of $7 million thereof from
December 31, 2005. This increase in working capital resulted primarily from
a decrease in accounts payable partially offset by a decrease in our cash
balances due to expenditures for the shutdown of our styrene unit in the first
quarter of 2006.
Cash Flow
Net cash used in our operations was
$7 million for the first nine months of 2006, compared to the
$58 million in net cash provided by operations during the first nine months
of 2005. This decrease in net cash flow in the first nine months of 2006 was
primarily driven by the cash outflow associated with the styrene turnaround and
repairs to our styrene facility and an increase in inventories. Cash flow during
the first nine months of 2005 was also positively impacted by approximately
$41 million from the depletion of working capital associated with our
closure of our acrylonitrile facility during February 2005. Net cash flow
used in our investing activities was $8 million during the first nine months of
2006, whereas we used $6 million of net cash flow in our investing
activities during the first nine months of 2005. There were no net repayments
under our Revolver during the first nine months of 2006 compared to
$18 million of net repayments in the first nine months of 2005.
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures were
$10 million during the first nine months of 2006 compared to $5 million
during the first nine months of 2005. This increase was due to an assortment of
projects completed during the styrene turnaround in the first quarter of 2006.
We expect our capital expenditures for the remainder of 2006 to be approximately
$3 million, primarily for routine safety, environmental and replacement
capital.
Contractual Cash
Obligations
The following table summarizes our
significant contractual obligations at September 30, 2006, and the effect
such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future
periods.
20
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
| |
|
year (1) |
|
1-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
5 years |
|
Total |
| |
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
100,579 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
100,579 |
|
|
Interest payments on
long-term debt |
|
|
10,142 |
|
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,171 |
|
|
Operating
leases |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
Purchase obligations
(2) |
|
|
74,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
|
149,000 |
|
|
|
394,000 |
|
|
Pension and other
postretirement benefits |
|
|
10,340 |
|
|
|
17,856 |
|
|
|
8,142 |
|
|
|
30,491 |
|
|
|
66,829 |
|
|
Contractual obligations
of discontinued operations |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
756 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
95,531 |
|
|
$ |
224,343 |
|
|
$ |
79,728 |
|
|
$ |
179,784 |
|
|
$ |
579,386 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
|
Payment obligations under our Revolver are not presented because there
were no outstanding borrowings at September 30, 2006 and interest
payments fluctuate depending on the interest rate and outstanding balance
under our Revolver at any point in time. |
| |
| (2) |
|
For the purposes of this table, we have considered contractual
obligations for the purchase of goods or services as agreements involving
more than $1 million that are enforceable and legally binding and
that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities
to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions and the
approximate timing of the transaction. Most of the purchase obligations
identified include variable pricing provisions. We have estimated the
future prices of these items, utilizing forward curves where available.
The pricing estimated for use in this table is subject to market
risk. |
New Accounting
Standards
In September 2005, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 04-13, “Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same
Counterparty” (“EITF No. 04-13”). EITF No. 04-13 provides that two or
more legally separate exchange transactions with the same counterparty should be
combined and considered as a single arrangement for purposes of applying
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions,” when the transactions were entered into in contemplation of one
another. EITF No. 04-13 contains several indicators to be considered in
assessing whether two transactions are entered into in contemplation of one
another. If, based on consideration of the indicators and the substance of the
arrangement, two transactions are combined and considered a single arrangement,
an exchange of finished goods inventory for either raw material inventory or
work-in-process inventory should be accounted for at fair value. The provisions
of EITF No. 04-13 were effective for transactions beginning April 1,
2006. Adoption of EITF No. 04-13 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes–an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” (“FIN 48”) to clarify the
accounting for uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” This interpretation
prescribes a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring tax benefits and
requires explicit disclosure of any uncertain tax position. FIN 48 is effective
for us on January 1, 2007. We are currently evaluating what impact, if any,
the adoption of FIN 48 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS No. 158”). SFAS No. 158 requires the
recognition of the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit
plans on the balance sheet. The overfunded or underfunded status would be
recognized as an asset or liability on the balance sheet with changes occurring
during the current year reflected through the comprehensive income portion of
equity. SFAS No. 158 will also require the measurement date of the funded
status of our defined benefit postretirement plans match the date of our fiscal
year-end financial statements, eliminating the use of earlier measurement dates
that were previously permissible. We will be required to initially recognize the
funded status of our defined benefit postretirement plan and provide the
required disclosures as of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. The
requirement to measure the assets and benefit obligations of our defined benefit
postretirement plans as of the date of our fiscal year-end statement of
financial position will be effective for our fiscal year ending
December 31, 2008.
In September 2006, the Securities
and Exchanged Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
“Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108
provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal
of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year
misstatement. The SEC staff believes that registrants should quantify errors
using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether
either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all
21
relevant quantitative
and qualitative factors are considered, is material. We will adopt SAB 108 for
our fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 and do not believe that SAB 108
will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting
Policies, Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, we review our estimates,
including those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, recoverability
of long-lived assets, deferred tax asset valuation allowance, litigation,
environmental liabilities, pension and post-retirement benefits and various
other operating allowances and accruals, based on currently available
information. Changes in facts and circumstances may alter such estimates and
affect our results of operations and financial position in future periods. There
have been no material changes or developments in our evaluation of the
accounting estimates or the underlying assumptions or methodologies that we
believe to be Critical Accounting Policies disclosed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our financial results can be affected
by volatile changes in raw materials, natural gas and finished product sales
prices. Borrowings under our Revolver bear interest, at our option, at an annual
rate of either the Alternate Base Rate plus 0.75% or the “LIBO Rate” (as defined
in our Revolver) plus 2.75%. The “Alternate Base Rate” is equal to the greater
of the “Base Rate” as announced from time to time by JPMorgan Chase Bank in New
York, New York or 0.50% per annum above the latest “Federal Funds Rate” (as
defined in our Revolver). There were no borrowings under our Revolver during the
second quarter of 2006. The fair value of our Revolver is the same as its
carrying value due to the short-term nature of this financial instrument. Our
Secured Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 10%, payable semi-annually on
June 15 and December 15 of each year. The fair value of our Secured
Notes is based on their quoted price, which may vary in response to changing
interest rates. As of September 30, 2006, the fair value of the Secured
Notes was approximately $94.6 million.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management necessarily applies its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits
of such controls and procedures which, by their nature, can provide only
reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives.
We carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, as of the end of the fiscal period covered by this
report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, each of our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
relating to us (including our consolidated subsidiary) that is required to be
disclosed in our Exchange Act reports. In connection with our evaluation, no
change was identified in our internal controls over financial reporting that
occurred during the third quarter of 2006 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
Under the current rules and regulations
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, beginning with our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for 2007, we will be subject to the provisions of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that require an annual management
assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting. Beginning with our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2008, we will be subject to the related
attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm.
22
PART II.
OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
The information under “Legal
Proceedings” in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in
Item 1 of Part I of this report is hereby incorporated by reference.
Item 5.
Other Information
On November 10, 2006, our Board of
Directors increased the number of directors constituting our whole Board from
six to seven and appointed Mr. Steve Gidumal to fill the vacancy resulting
from the creation of this newly-created directorship. Mr. Gidumal’s will
serve as one of our directors until our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
until his successor is duly elected and qualified or until his earlier death or
his resignation or removal as one of our directors. Mr. Gidumal was also
appointed as a member of the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors to
fill the vacancy created by Mr. Philip M. Sivin’s resignation as a member
of our Compensation Committee. Resurgence Asset Management, L.L.C.
(“Resurgence”) recommended to our Corporate Governance Committee that
Mr. Gidumal be appointed as one of our directors. Our Corporate Governance
Committee reviewed Mr. Gidumal’s candidacy as a member of our Board of
Directors, and recommended to our Board that Mr. Gidumal be appointed as
one of our directors. Mr. Gidumal’s election to our Board of Directors was
not pursuant to any arrangement or understanding with any other persons, except
as generally described in the following paragraph.
Mr. Gidumal is a Managing Director
and a Co-Chief Investment Officer of Resurgence. Resurgence has beneficial
ownership of a substantial majority of the voting power of our equity securities
due to its investment and disposition authority over securities owned by its and
its affiliates’ managed funds and accounts. Currently, Resurgence has beneficial
ownership of over 98% of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and over
60% of our common stock, representing ownership of over 80% of the total voting
power of our equity. The holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock are entitled to designate a number of our directors roughly proportionate
to their overall equity ownership, but in any event not less than a majority of
our directors as long as they hold in the aggregate at least 35% of the total
voting power of our equity. As a result, these holders have the ability to
control our management, policies and financing decisions, elect a majority of
our Board and control the vote on most matters presented to a vote of our
stockholders. Pursuant to established policies of Resurgence, all director
compensation earned by its employees for service on our Board of Directors is
paid to Resurgence. As with our other directors that are employees of
Resurgence, any director compensation earned by Mr. Gidumal is expected to
be paid to Resurgence pursuant to its established policies. Currently, that
would include an annual retainer of $25,000 for his service as a director and
meeting attendance fees of $2,500 for each Board meeting held in person and
$1,250 for each telephonic Board meeting. It will also include attendance fees
of $1,500 for each Compensation Committee meeting held in person and $750 for
each telephonic Compensation Committee meeting.
Item 6.
Exhibits
The following are filed or furnished as
part of this Form 10-Q:
| |
|
|
|
|
| Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
| Number |
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
- |
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger merging
Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. into Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
- |
|
Joint Plan of Reorganization of Sterling
Chemicals Holdings, Inc., et al., dated October 14, 2002
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to our Form 8-K
filed on November 26, 2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
- |
|
First Modification to Joint Plan of
Reorganization of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc., et al., dated
November 18, 2002 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.2 to
our Form 8-K filed on November 26, 2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
- |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (conformed copy) (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
- |
|
Restated Certificate of Designations,
Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31,
2003). |
23
| |
|
|
|
|
| Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
| Number |
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
3.3 |
|
- |
|
Restated Bylaws of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
(conformed copy) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**10.1+ |
|
- |
|
Sterling Chemicals, Inc. Amended and Restated
2002 Stock Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**10.2+ |
|
- |
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Key Employee
Protection Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**10.3+ |
|
- |
|
Sterling Chemicals, Inc. Amended and Restated
Salaried Employees’ Pension Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**15.1 |
|
- |
|
Letter of Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding
unaudited interim financial information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**31.1 |
|
- |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**31.2 |
|
- |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**32.1 |
|
- |
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**32.2 |
|
- |
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**99.1 |
|
- |
|
Compensation Committee Charter of Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. |
|
|
|
| ** |
|
Filed or furnished herewith |
| |
| + |
|
Management contracts or compensatory plans or
arrangements. |
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STERLING CHEMICALS, INC. (Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 13,
2006 |
|
By |
|
/s/ RICHARD K. CRUMP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard K. Crump |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 13,
2006 |
|
By |
|
/s/ PAUL G. VANDERHOVEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul G. Vanderhoven |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
25
EXHIBIT INDEX
| |
|
|
|
|
| Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
| Number |
|
|
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
- |
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger merging
Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. into Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
- |
|
Joint Plan of Reorganization of Sterling
Chemicals Holdings, Inc., et al., dated October 14, 2002
(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to our Form 8-K
filed on November 26, 2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
- |
|
First Modification to Joint Plan of
Reorganization of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc., et al., dated
November 18, 2002 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.2 to
our Form 8-K filed on November 26, 2002). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
- |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (conformed copy) (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
- |
|
Restated Certificate of Designations,
Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock of Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
- |
|
Restated Bylaws of Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
(conformed copy) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**10.1+ |
|
- |
|
Sterling Chemicals, Inc. Amended and Restated
2002 Stock Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**10.2+ |
|
- |
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Key Employee
Protection Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**10.3+ |
|
- |
|
Sterling Chemicals, Inc. Amended and Restated
Salaried Employees’ Pension Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**15.1 |
|
- |
|
Letter of Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding
unaudited interim financial information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**31.1 |
|
- |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**31.2 |
|
- |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**32.1 |
|
- |
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**32.2 |
|
- |
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**99.1 |
|
- |
|
Compensation Committee Charter of Sterling
Chemicals, Inc. |
|
|
|
| ** |
|
Filed or furnished herewith |
| |
| + |
|
Management contracts or compensatory plans or
arrangements. |